Connect with us


Would one real compliance officer have spared the Navy’s Pacific Command?



The Fat Leonard outrage has annihilated the U.S. Naval force’s Pacific Command. Up until now, sixteen litigants have been charged for the situation. They incorporate an Admiral, five Commanders, a Captain, and a Petty Officer. At the end of the day, the hierarchy of leadership.

Fat Leonard will be Leonard Glenn Francis. The Malaysian national, 51, confessed to paying off scores of U.S. Naval force authorities with travel, dinners, money, gadgets, gatherings, and whores. He’s holding up to be condemned.

His Singapore-based organization – Glenn Defense Marine Asia – if port administrations to U.S. Naval force transport in Asia. As a component of his request understanding, Francis conceded over-charging the Navy more than $35 million on contracts to stock and clean ships.

A few litigants gave Fat Leonard delicate Navy insider facts – deliver development plans, port-of-call designs, reports about examinations concerning his organization, and evaluating data from contenders. Others helped him dupe the Navy with an imposter or swelled solicitations. One helped Fat Leonard’s vessels dodge traditions examinations all through the Philippines. The vast majority of the respondents misled examiners about their dealings with Fat Leonard.

It was an embarrassment that could have been maintained a strategic distance from. Extortion protests about Fat Leonard and his organization began in 2006, the Washington Post announced. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) opened 27 isolate examinations concerning his organization.

“In each of those cases, be that as it may, NCIS shut the case in the wake of neglecting to uncover adequate confirmation to make a move against the firm,” the Washington Post said. The paper assessed many pages of law requirement records ­obtained under the Freedom of ­Information Act.

Naval force staff members at U.S. Pacific Fleet base camp were so stressed over potential inconvenience that they drafted another morals arrangement to debilitate Navy workforce from tolerating favours from Fat Leonard, the WaPo report said. “In any case, their exertion was hindered for over two years by chiefs of naval operations who were neighbourly with the contractual worker, as per authorities acquainted with the issue.”


Each Navy officer takes and vow and should maintain it. So they’re altogether anticipated that would be a piece of the acquiescence work.

I, [name], do seriously swear (or confirm) that I will bolster and safeguard the Constitution of the United States against all adversaries, remote and household; that I will bear genuine confidence and steadfastness to the same; that I take this commitment uninhibitedly, with no mental reservation or motivation behind avoidance; and that I will well and dependably release the obligations of the workplace on which I am going to enter. With God as my witness.

Be that as it may, when compliance is an aspect of everybody’s responsibilities, is it here and there nobody’s activity? That resembles what occurred in the Navy’s Pacific Command. Debasement achieved all levels. Rather than uncovering the unite, the hierarchy of leadership concealed it.


Shouldn’t something be said about what’s to come?

Rather than depending on everybody for compliance, shouldn’t something be said about assigned compliance officers who answer to somebody outside the prompt hierarchy of leadership? Give that compliance officer nonstop and open access to the books and records, similar to an on-location free evaluator. Influence the compliance officer, a person the informants can trust and depend on to shield against countering from inside the levels of leadership.

Installing an autonomous compliance officer prevents shenanigans – for the Navy or some other association. Outside eyes dependably increment the odds of getting got.

For the Navy, the complaint to that plan is self-evident. The military can’t carry out its activity without a hierarchy of leadership. Be that as it may, the Navy as of now has a point by point objection methodology. Indeed, even NCIS should have a part. None of that ceased Fat Leonard’s defilement and extortion.

Autonomous oversight. A sheltered outlet for informants. Balanced governance. That is the main way genuine consistency can work.

The Fat Leonard outrage has officially deserted excessively human destruction. For the Navy, something new is justified regardless of an attempt.


Here’s a gander at some of that human destruction. It includes 16 respondents, up until now.

Notwithstanding Fat Leonard, four different officials from his organization have been charged – Alex Wisidagama, Ed Aruffo, Neil Peterson, and Linda Raja.

Wisidagama confessed and was condemned in March to 63 months in jail and $34.8 million in compensation to the Navy. Aruffo has confessed and is holding up to be condemned. Peterson and Raja have been removed from Singapore to the United States a month ago. Their cases are pending.

The rest of the 11 respondents are present or previous U.S. Naval force authorities.

They include:


Naval commander Robert Gilbeau (conceded)

Lt. Officer Gentry Debord (condemned to 30 months in jail)

Officer Bobby Pitts (anticipating trial)

Skipper Daniel Dusek (condemned to 46 months in jail)

Officer Michael Misiewicz (condemned to 78 months in jail)

Lt. Officer Todd Malaki (condemned to 40 months in jail)

Officer Jose Luis Sanchez (conceded)

Previous NCIS Supervisory Special Agent John Beliveau II (condemned to 144 months in jail)

Trivial Officer First Class Daniel Layug (condemned to 27 in jail), and

Paul Simpkins, a previous DoD regular citizen representative who supervised contracting in Singapore (condemned to 72 months in jail).

Three other Rear Admirals including the authority of maritime powers in Japan resigned in 2015 after the Secretary of the Navy blamed them for the Fat Leonard embarrassment.


Spread the love
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


A Breakdown Of HIP-HOP’s Most Notorious Murders




Tupac Shakur and Christopher Wallace, otherwise called Biggie Smalls, were probably the most notable and powerful rappers of our opportunity.

Despite the fact that the two specialists ruled the hip-bounce scene in the mid ’90s — with Tupac in California and Biggie in New York — they were both deplorably slaughtered in drive-by shootings. Their homicides have stayed unsolved until this day, and the twosome’s warmed East Coast-West Coast contention has energized different paranoid notions throughout the years.

Who was 2Pac?

Tupac Amaru Shakur was conceived on June 16, 1971. In spite of the fact that he would wind up synonymous with West Coast hip-jump, he was conceived in New York City. His folks were the two individuals from the Black Panther Party.

2Pac’s late mother, Afeni, wound up pregnant with her child while on bail. According to NBC News, she had really been charged, alongside different individuals from the Panthers, for scheming to bomb police headquarters and retail establishments in New York City, and in spite of the fact that the charges were later absolved she had burned through 11 months in prison.

2Pac’s dad, Billy Garland, lost contact with the rapper when he was 5 years of age. They wouldn’t rejoin until the point when 2Pac was 23.

In 1996, 2Pac told writer Kevin Powell in Vibe magazine that “I thought my dad was dead all my life. I believed I required a daddy to give me the general tour and I didn’t have one.”

A single parent with two youngsters, Afeni moved the family frequently and battled monetarily. They in the end moved to Baltimore, and 2Pac selected at the esteemed Baltimore School for the Arts. He met his friend Jada Pinkett Smith there and called the time “the freest I at any point felt.”

Simply this year, Jada opened up about her association with 2Pac on Sway’s Sirius XM appear, conceding that she met him when she was managing drugs.

“I’ve been having sort of an existential emergency around Pac since I was turning out, he was coming in, and there was a time when we met. And afterward we kinda were going our different ways. What’s more, I just felt like, ‘alright, God, one day you will improve the situation Pac what you improved the situation me, which is, you spared me.’ And that just never occurred for him,” she said.

[Photo: Getty Images]

The family moved to Marin City, California, and Afeni capitulated to split addiction, according to NBC News.

At 17, 2Pac met a lady named Leila Steinberg, who might help him in the long run get his foot into the music business in 1990 as a roadie and artist for the hip-bounce gather Digital Underground known for “The Humpty Dance.”

In 1991 a recording debut on “Same Song” was made by him from the Nothing yet Trouble soundtrack. He marked to Interscope Records and discharged his presentation collection, 2Pacalypse Now, in 1991. The collection was proclaimed for going up against subjects like bigotry, viciousness and police fierceness, particularly on tracks like “Brenda’s Got a Baby” and “Caught.”

As 2Pac’s mother stated, she was “in the prime of utilizing” and didn’t know that her child was getting to be acclaimed.

She once told the Associated Press: “Somebody disclosed to me that Tupac was on The Arsenio Hall Show, and I thought they were lying.”

She got spotless a year later after 2Pac went up against her.

Spread the love
Continue Reading


Top 3 Scandals In sports




Professional sports is an arena where there is a huge potential for earning and decision making. With immense power to make decision often leads to scandals due to greed and ambitious misconduct. Players, mangers, and club often pay a very hefty price both professionally as well as personally when such events are uncovered. Loss of trust, legal ramifications and a tough after life are probably the results of such scandals.

Today we look at 3 top scandals that rocked the sports world and proved to be a great example for the fans and people around the globe alike.

Rape conviction for Mike Tyson

Mike Tyson is a controversial person. Known for his eccentricities, he had been embroiled in controversies from the beginning of his career. However, the boxing professional life suffered a serious blow when Tyson was convicted of rape. Desiree Washington accused Tyson of raping her in 1991 at an Indianapolis hotel which went on to become the most shocking and sensational trial in sports history. Tyson was eventually found guilty and was sent to prison for 6 years; out of 6 years, he served only 3 years after which he was allowed to fight professionally.

Sexual Assault Case of Kobe Bryant

Basketball sensation Kobe Bryant was arrested in 2003 for sexually assaulting a 19-year-old Canadian woman. Charges were dismissed when the accuser denied testifying and the case was settled out of court. Later it was revealed that the player had sexual relations with the woman but it was a consensual one and therefore was not a criminal. As a result, Bryant lost several of his endorsement deals, including a lucrative one with fast food giant McDonalds. The Bryant case was voted the top sports story of 2003 by the Associated Press.

Doping in Tour de France

Lance Armstrong was the favourite target for the media for doping allegations in the Tour de France race. Despite relentless accusations, Armstrong has never been found guilty of using illegal performance enhancers. However, other cyclist sportspersons like Alexander Vinokourov, Cristian Moreni, Jan Ullrich and Floyd Landis were found guilty in doping.

Scandals remain prevalent in the sports arena due to ambitions and abuse of power. Doping, sexual assault, gambling rackets, weapon assault, etc. are some of the charges that sports professionals are often involved with. The high stress and lavish lifestyle surrounded by tempting offers of corruption and power often pave the way to immoral conduct on the part of sportsperson who are looked upon as role models and trendsetters.

Disclaimer: Photographs utilized by this page is not the sole property of the page or it administrators; the photos utilized by us come from around the worldwide web and are shared publicly.

Spread the love
Continue Reading


MARINE Reports ‘PSTD’ To Avoid Jail Time For Attacking Iraqi Restaurant




Now people use post-traumatic disorder as a reason for assaulting individuals.

A court in Oregon thinks so. Damien Rodriguez won’t confront any correctional facility time despite the fact that he was initially accused of strike and a despise wrongdoing, charges that ordinarily place individuals in prison for no less than five or six years. Rather, he got five years of probation and a fine, The Oregonian reported.

Rodriguez was a dynamic obligation Marine when he assaulted a server at an Iraqi eatery with a seat in Portland last year, The Associated Press reported.

A companion told police that he endured a “flashback within the eatery.” Before assaulting the server he supposedly discussed how individuals he slaughtered in Iraq before saying considerably all the more stigmatizing comments in regards to the nation

There’s no question that the assault happened. It was gotten on video.

Rodriguez, 41, conceded to a hate crime and to attempted assault in Multnomah County Circuit Court, a court that went simple on him on account of a distress he purportedly endured at war. His barrier lawyer contended that the assault originated from his PTSD. Prosecutors had a tendency to concur, expressing that representatives at the Iraqi eatery DarSalam bolstered Rodriguez’s light sentence. The worker didn’t endure genuine wounds and Rodriguez has been requested by the court to give him $11,000 dollars, agreeing to The Daily Beast.

What do you think?

Spread the love
Continue Reading